AT&T Tells Us Customer Service Critique UnfairInsists they're actually meeting most CT DPUC metrics 05:13PM Thursday Nov 20 2008 by Karl Bodetags: legal · business · consumers · AT&T U-Verse · AT&T SoutheastYesterday we noted how AT&T was taking heat from Connecticut's Attorney General for poor customers service in the state, something local unions say is thanks to the firing of 1,000 employees over the last decade. AT&T's relationship with Connecticut is already on shaky ground, after the State DPUC tried to force U-Verse to adhere to cable regulations, and forced AT&T to get consent of homeowners before plunking down VDSL VRADs. As for their customers service, AT&T contacted me overnight to state they don't feel like they're getting a fair shake. Connecticuts clock runs continuously. So if a customer calls at 7 p.m. but does not want us to show up until after 9 a.m. the next morning we are already at a loss of 14 of our 24 hours to make repairs. -AT&T, on customer service in CT |
According to AT&T spokesman Seth Bloom, there are five metrics used by the DPUC in Connecticut and AT&T scores well above average on four out of five of them. "Most notably, we score extremely well on the "trouble per 100 access lines" metric where we perform 32 percent better than the DPUC's guidelines," says Bloom, who notes complaints per 100k subs is also dropping. As for CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's claims that AT&T doesn't have phone service repaired within 24 hours (a state consumer protection law), AT&T suggests that Connecticut's criteria isn't particularly fair -- though according to data filed with the CT DPUC, AT&T has failed to meet the standard for going on eight years now. "Unlike other states that stop the service clock on nights, weekends, and holidays, Connecticuts clock runs continuously," says Bloom. "So if a customer calls at 7 p.m. but does not want us to show up until after 9 a.m. the next morning we are already at a loss of 14 of our 24 hours to make repairs." AT&T wouldn't confirm the unions' claims of 1,000 workers being laid off over the last decade, but Bloom points out that some of that has to do with the loss in traditional landlines. "Hiring is happening where the growth is - U-verse and wireless," he notes. Bloom goes on to claim that AT&T responds to 100% of customer inquiries within 10 seconds or less, and successfully clears all requests for service points. According to Bloom, AT&T is also far from being the only carrier in Connecticut that falls short when it comes to the 24-hour response clock. Any AT&T DSL or phone customers in Connecticut care to chime in with their repair experiences? Related:- AT&T Aims Its PR Guns At Connecticut
- The EFF Sues The President
- AT&T To Pay $17 Million For USF Over-Charging
- British Telecom To Expand Phorm Use
- Why Are ISPs Still Advertising Limited Services As Unlimited?
- Will Being RIAA Lapdogs Make ISP Support Worse?
- Time Warner Cable Customers May Lose Viacom Channels
- Qwest Ordered To Restore Services To SkyWi
|
 |  |  |  |  ender7074
join:2006-11-21 Saint Louis, MO
·AT&T Southeast
·Charter Pipeline
| said by Dude :As for CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's claims that AT&T doesn't have phone service repaired within 24 hours (a state consumer protection law) I wish thats how it wass here in Illini I thought it was. I used to work for Charter in their phone department and we had a 24 hour window to get phones fixed in the St. Louis area, Illinois side included. I may be remembering that wrong though. | |
|  |  |   BSD24 Premium join:2008-04-30 Taunton, MA clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Illini said by ender7074 :said by Dude :As for CT Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's claims that AT&T doesn't have phone service repaired within 24 hours (a state consumer protection law) I wish thats how it wass here in Illini I thought it was. I used to work for Charter in their phone department and we had a 24 hour window to get phones fixed in the St. Louis area, Illinois side included. I may be remembering that wrong though. Comcast does to, but thats more of a "company policy" - not a local/state/federal law. Companies - or rather humans (in general) make mistakes. Laws punish mistakes, company policy is more of guidelines and a reason to credit. | |
|  |  |   uther
join:2001-12-04 Saint Peters, MO
| said by ender7074 :I thought it was. I used to work for Charter in their phone department and we had a 24 hour window to get phones fixed in the St. Louis area, Illinois side included. I may be remembering that wrong though. I also used to work for Charter's TTM department. I remember a manager stating that the 24 hour window rule was mandated by FCC.
If Charter leaves a no dial tone issue out past 24 hours, FCC fines Charter. | |
|  |   tad2020
join:2007-07-17 Orange, CA
·AT&T DSL Service
| I'm lucky if they fix their own mistakes within 24 hours, like when they disconnect my offices main number when we tried to change the phone number on a fax line and when they "fixed" that they had actually disconnected both lines. It took about 3 days to get it sorted out. | |
|  |  |  |   Harvey C
@pacbell.net | AT$T versus Connecticut AG Let me ask this question:
Which would respond quicker and better to a request for assistance, AT&T's service department or the Connecticut Attorney General's office? | |
|  |  centc408
join:2008-11-08 Fort Wayne, IN | Re: AT$T versus Connecticut AG You asked a rhetorical question. The answer is the CAGO. | |
|  |  |   VegasMan Are We There Yet?
join:2002-11-17 Schaumburg, IL | Lucky I guess I got lucky. The last time I called ATT for service there was a truck outside working within 3 hours and service was back within the hour after that point. -- In need of a Vegas vacation.
| |
|   tad2020
join:2007-07-17 Orange, CA
·AT&T DSL Service
| "AT&T responds to 100% of customer inquiries within 10 sec" quote: Bloom goes on to claim that AT&T responds to 100% of customer inquiries within 10 seconds or less
How is that so? It always takes me at least 15 minutes to get through Mr. Robot to get in to be on hold for 20 minutes to get a person that will then transfer me to the person who can transfer me to the person who's actually the CS dept like I asked Mr. Robot to send me to. It gets extra annoying when they need to have me call them back with a transfer code then give the new person my number so they can call me back because they "need to initiate the call".
Their current average with me is 3-8 days for a tech to come out, and 1-3 weeks after that for the problem to finally be resolved. | |
|   yuutomo The Wonder Kitter Premium join:2001-08-27 Missoula, MT | Waah..waah..cry me a handful... they can either step down and shut up, or they can be ready to be ousted in a far more rougher fashion.
I have no sympathy for any corporation that has stifled, and killed innovation in the world. | |
|  | |  |
|
|